Bankruptcy Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Chapter 11 Law - Essay Example Each case can document any of these sorts of liquidation, be that as it may, a particular section might be more qualified for every individual case. Section 11 is for the most part liquidation for business and its motivation is to redesign the obligation of the business. Rearrangement separates the credit accounts into various classes and resources are then condensed and dispersed. The borrower can devise an arrangement of revamping for the endorsement of the court inside a 120-day cutoff time or the account holder can demand a court designated trustee to design the rearrangement. This section of liquidation permits the business to keep on working during the chapter 11 under the oversight of Bankruptcy Court. Part 11 takes into consideration liquidation of the business resources that are not quickly required for the activity of the business and an arrangement for installment of the advantages required for the activity of the business. This will permit the sole owner for this situation to remain in business and she can change her business to a progressively appropriate and beneficial business under the oversight of the court while simultaneously dispensing with most of her obligation. For this situation, the indebted person should document section 7 liquidation. The borrower is doled out a trustee who exchanges resources and afterward partitions the returns decently among the lenders.

Call Center Manager

The BCG network strategy depends on the item life cycle hypothesis that can be utilized to figure out what needs ought to be given in the item arrangement of a specialty unit. To guarantee long haul esteem creation, an organization ought to have an arrangement of items that contains both high-development items needing money information sources and low-development items that produce a great deal of money. It has 2 measurements: piece of the overall industry and market development. The essential thought behind it is that the greater the piece of the overall industry an item has or the quicker the item's market develops, the better it is for the organization. Setting items in the BCG framework brings about 4 classes in an arrangement of an organization: †¢ Cash Cow †a specialty unit that has an enormous piece of the overall industry in a develop, slow developing industry. Money bovines require little speculation and create money that can be utilized to put resources into different specialty units. †¢ Star †a specialty unit that has an enormous piece of the pie in a quickly developing industry. Stars may create money, but since the market is developing quickly they expect speculation to keep up their lead. On the off chance that fruitful, a star will turn into a money dairy animals when its industry develops. Question Mark (or Problem Child) †a specialty unit that has a little piece of the pie in a high development showcase. These specialty units expect assets to develop piece of the pie, yet whether they will succeed and become stars is obscure. †¢ Dog †a specialty unit that has a little piece of the pie in a develop industry. A canine may not require significant money, yet it ties up capital that could all the more likely be conveyed somewhere else. Except if a pooch has some other key reason, it ought to be exchanged if there is little possibility for it to pick up piece of the overall industry. pic] Some restrictions of the Boston Consulting Group Matrix include: †¢ High piece of the overall industry isn't the main achievement factor †¢ Market development isn't the main pointer for engaging quality of a market †¢ Sometimes Dogs can gain considerably more money as Cash Cows The BCG Matrix technique can help comprehend a much of the time committed procedure error: having a one-size-fits-all-way to deal with methodology, for example, a conventional development target (9 percent for each year) or a nonexclusive profit for capital of state 9. % for a whole enterprise. In such a situation: A. Money Cows Business Units will beat their benefit target effectively; their administration have a simple activity and are regularly lauded at any rate. Far and away more terrible, they are regularly permitted to reinvest generous money sums in their organizations which are adult and not developing any longer. B. Pooches Business Units face an outlandish conflict and, much more dreadful, speculations are made once in a while in miserable endeavors to ‘turn the business around'. C. Therefore (all) Question Marks and Stars Business Units get average size venture reserves. Along these lines they can't ever become money dairy animals. These insufficient put away wholes of cash are a misuse of cash. Either these SBUs ought to get enough speculation assets to empower them to accomplish a genuine market predominance and become a money cow (or star), or in any case organizations are encouraged to disinvest and attempt to get whatever conceivable money impossible denotes that were not chosen.

Critical Review Historians and the Extent of Slave Ownership in the Southern United States essays

Basic Review Historians and the Extent of Slave Ownership in the Southern United States articles Students of history and the Extent of Slave Ownership in the Southern United States Just a minority of the whites claimed slaves, consistently almost three-fourths of the white families in the South all in all held no slaves; slave possession in the South was not broad; not in excess of a fourth of the white heads of families were slave proprietors, and even in the cotton expresses the extent was short of what 33%; in 1850, just one of every three claimed any Negroes; just before the Civil War, the apportion was one out of four; and slave proprietors presumably made up not exactly 33% of southern whites. From the US History reading material in a primary school to the Civil War diaries of a significant college, these lines are republished and rehashed trying to shape the view of the general population and to facilitate the uncertainties of a country humiliated by subjection, an establishment that as far as anyone knows defaced its magnificent history, or so says Otto H. Olsen. In an article that shows up in the diary of Civil War History of 1972 entitled, Historians and the Extent of Slave Ownership in the Southern United States Olsen endeavors to challenge the broadly acknowledged thought that slave proprietorship was kept to just a couple of southern white estate proprietors and that a large portion of the white populace was unaffected by it. The writer spends almost 50% of his thirty-seven passage article showing the over a significant time span mentalities of everybody through a few contextual analyses which he records sequentially and clarifies to sum things up detail. He attempts to ruin a bunch of them while, simultaneously, infusing his own perspectives. While trying to convince the peruser he sets up his side of the discussion by refering to a couple of contextual investigations that advance his theory and finishes up by relating his very own portion feelings and discoveries including an examination where he makes an apparently solid correlation b etween thos... <!

The Doctor in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest - Literature Essay Samples

Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest is part of a select club of books that yield both fantastic reads and excellent film adaptions. The movie is enjoyable even though it altered the book, both for the sake of brevity and for artistic flair. One of these changes from book to movie is in the character of Dr. Spivey. When transformed from book to movie, Dr. Spivey remains a minor character who appears only briefly in both, but plays a more crucial role in the movie because the movie focuses on McMurphy; here, Dr. Spivey’s actions directly impact McMurphy’s development. Kesey’s book is narrated from the perspective of Bromden, an insane Native American who pretends to be mute. Bromden’s first person narrative works well in the book because it provides a candid account of the events in the asylum. However, Bromden’s narrative includes frequent hallucinations which make for interesting reading in the book, but would have been difficult to portray in the movie. The written word is highly suitable when we enter Bromden’s schizophrenic mind, but the medium of the movie cannot easily convey well such inner thoughts even if the audience were able to â€Å"hear† the thoughts. That may be why the movie uses the third person perspective and Bromden is dropped as the narrator. We know nothing about his internal thoughts and can only see what he and the other characters do. This change from book to film was also necessary since one cannot have a mute character be the narrator without the benefit of seeing into the characterâ⠂¬â„¢s mind. Bromden had to dropped as narrator in order for the move to be successful. At the same time, the movie promotes McMurphy as protagonist. This is not surprising since the role of McMurphy went to Jack Nicholson, who was already a Hollywood star, with the potential to make this movie a blockbuster. Forman, the director of the movie, chose to focus on McMurphy’s character, and made him highly appealing to the audience. Whereas, in the book, the reader may have disliked some of McMurphy’s actions (most notably when he scams the ward out of money by having Chief lift the control console), viewers of the movie soundly support McMurphy, cheering him on in his rebellion against Nurse Ratched and the authorities. With such star power as Jack Nicholson’s, it is only natural that a director would want McMurphy to be the focus of the movie and push Bromden aside for most of the movie. The difference in McMurphy’s role (between book and movie) is so sharp that it impacts the role of minor characters such as Dr. Spivey. In both book and movie, Dr. Spivey is in charge of diagnosing whether or not McMurphy is actually insane or if he is simply trying to get out of work. However, when carrying out this task, the doctor in the movie is quite different from that of the doctor in the book. The doctor is a somewhat weak character in the book, but strong in the movie. Further, his role in the movie (compared to the book) has a greater impact on McMurphy because McMurphy is the focus of the movie. In the book, the doctor seems amused and delighted by McMurphy when he first meets him during the first interview. Bromden states, â€Å"He’s smiling a little as he turns through the folder, just as tickled by this new man’s brassy way of talking right up as the rest of us, but, just like the rest of us, he’s careful not to let himself come right out and laugh.â€Å"(45). Later in the book. Dr. Spivey becomes friendly towards McMurphy when he realizes that McMurphy and he went to same high school. Dr. Spivey is not so easygoing in the movie. In the book, at a meeting with the interns and Nurse Ratched, Dr. Spivey shows he is too afraid to take a decision about McMurphy and, instead, he asks the others for their opinion of McMurphy: â€Å"[H]e is a disturbing factor, that’s obvious. So—ah—as I see it, our course in this discussion is to decide what action to take in dealing with him. I believe the nurse called this meeting—correct me if I’m off base here, Miss Ratched—to talk the situation out and unify the staff’s opinion of what should be done about Mr. McMurphy?†(133). Nurse Ratched called the meeting in the first place and the meeting not only implicitly focuses on pleasing her but ends up with the nurse taking over and having her way. On the other hand, in the movie, during both interviews with McMurphy, Dr Spivey is professional and decisive. During the first interview in the movie, the doctor speaks plainly to McMurphy: â€Å"Well, youre here for a ninety-day observation period, Mister McMurphy. Id like you to understand you are here on a court order and we are responsible to the state. So, Id like your cooperation.† During the second interview, he calls McMurphy out on faking insanity: â€Å"Yes, that may be so, but in making a careful study of your past record, along with your behavior since you arrived here, my feeling is that you are not mentally ill and it is going to be my recommendation that you be returned to Pendleton where they are better equipped to handle your case.† Dr Spivey does not waver nor relent when McMurphy protests that he is insane. The doctor insists that McMurphy should be discharged from the asylum despite the fact that the two most influential characters in the movie, McM urphy and Nurse Ratched, disagree (albeit for different reasons). In a clear departure from the book, Dr. Spivey is on the side of the authorities in the movie, and is an opponent to McMurphy. This shift is apparent in Dr. Spivey’s interviews with McMurphy, which force McMurphy to take a more aggressive stance and break more rules, and face serious consequences. McMurphy is lobotomized and Bromden is so shaken that he kills McMurphy and escapes the asylum. Dr. Spivey’s medical decision causes the downfall of McMurphy and led to Bromden’s actions at the end of the movie when he kills McMurphy and escapes. While clearly a horrible act, this shows his strong influence in the movie. Another difference from book to movie is in the doctor’s reactions to Nurse Ratched. In the book, the doctor is deferential towards the Nurse and even afraid of her. Harding says, â€Å"Doctor Spivey †¦ is exactly like the rest of us, McMurphy, completely conscious of his inadequacy. He’s a frightened, desperate, ineffectual little rabbit, totally incapable of running this ward without our Miss Ratched’s help, and he knows it. And, worse, she knows he knows it and reminds him every chance she gets† (59). It is also implied that the doctor is a drug addict and afraid that the nurse will report him and get him fired. He does not want to lose his job; therefore he keeps quiet and lets her run the ward her way until McMurphy comes along and inadvertently empowers the doctor. Before long, Dr. Spivey allows the patients to have recreational privileges and even hosts the fishing trip for the ward despite Nurse Ratched’s campaign against it. The doctor in the book is finally able to use his vision of proper psychiatric treatment which certainly doesn’t involve Nurse Ratched’s coercion and bullying. The doctor in the book even refuses to resign after Billy’s suicide and McMurphy’s attack on Nurse Ratched, a change of personality that might have been caused by watching McMurphy rebel. In contrast, in the movie, Dr. Spivey is clearly on the side of the authorities throughout. Dr. Spivey plays an important role in both the text and the movie, despite the small role that he is given. His role is that of an authority figure and he uses his authority to strongly impact the actions of the main character in the movie. However, he has less impact in the book on McMurphy’s character development.

Companys Corporate Social Responsibility Practices

In today’s free-market economy, where is your reputation stand for as a corporation often more matters than what products or services you offer. How the people feel about a company is solely based on their perceptions of good feelings, admiration, esteem, and finally, their trust in the company’s Corporate Social Responsibility practices (CSR). The companies with the best reputations will receive recognition from the public for their efforts and are on the right path of building a sustainable business for the future. A good reputation may include safe products and services, best workplace environment, financial performance, technology innovation, respectable leadership, socioeconomic justice, corporate governance and citizenship, and†¦show more content†¦Introduction Corporate social responsibility can be simply defined as the â€Å"business’s consideration of society’s well-being and consumer satisfaction, in addition to profits.† (Kurtz, 2015). The term Corporate Social Responsibility refers to a company who take responsibility to provide needy benefit to the society that support the company’s existing with consumer’s buying power. Social responsibility is considered a moral principle of a business entity. It is a duty of every business and its leadership in-charge to maintain the balance between business ethics and profit, and social responsibility. It is the social duty, the mission and commitment of the company to help improve the society by providing the best possible working and living conditions for its employees, their families, and effectively contributes to the community as a whole. Corporate Social Responsibility The social responsibility mission of the company may include actively reinforcing corporate policy on affirmative action to hire minority and disabled employees, charitable contributions to help improve the lives of the poor, taking an initiative and expresses attitudes on a political or social justice issues that may affect the community. Public corporations should engage in civil society by taking initiative in social responsibility because the government alone cannot maintain the prosperity of society just by using tax revenues. Microsoft and Corporate Social Responsibility. The software

The Between 19th And 18th Century Culture - 1804 Words

It’s no surprise that that 17th and 18th century culture differed greatly from today’s society. The beliefs, philosophy, and scientific theory from that time period have changed a lot over the course of time. Many common ideals from that era are considered ludicrous and bizarre today. One common belief held in 17th century cultures was the dominance of males in society. Men held all the power and played their patriarchal roles as heads of the family, this belief was assumed to be instituted by nature and God. The bible has influenced writers for centuries and it is used by people to justify life choices, and similarly, to point out flaws. The authority held by the Bible in early Britain allowed it to behave as the moral framework for the†¦show more content†¦I will make a helper suitable for him. (Genesis 2:18) Now it could be argued that this is God stating himself that woman is meant to be inferior to man. However, it is said that the word helper, is used to describe God, Himself, in Psalms 33:20. In Genesis 1:27, it is written that †¦God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. This statement implies equality within both genders and furthermore, it is written, Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground. (Genesis 2:27-28) This command given by God is directed at both Adam and Eve as it does not specify either one. The phrase â€Å"rule over† here is implying that man and woman are given equal amounts of power and it is meant to be practiced on animals and inferior beings, not any specific genders of humans. Although it seems that Adam are Eve are presented as equals, some portions of Genesis contradict this. When Adam and Eve disobeyed God in the Garden of Eden, they were each given punishments before being expelled from the Garden. To Adam God says, Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, You must not eat of it, Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life. It will produce thorns and thistles

Honor killings free essay sample

Every religion has their own rules and beliefs. If you are brought up and your parents are of a religion in many ways they may try to influence you to have the same religion and follow the rules and guide lines of that religion. But times are changing and we are now in the year â€Å"2014†. It should be okay to choose you own way of living, what you want to wear. As well as whom you want to marry. Marriage is a bond between two people who love each other not with a person you for one don’t even know and for two are being forced to marry. So with that being said, yes, I believe that honor killings are simply domestic violence. It is murder! Our readings states that, â€Å"Interpersonal crime is crime perpetrated within social relationships (Collica Furst, 2012). The similarities that honor killings have with other interpersonal crimes is that the parties involved know each other. We will write a custom essay sample on Honor killings or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page They are family. Also they are both mainly committed against women. As the article in our readings states, â€Å"honor killings† is a unique and disturbing form of interpersonal crime (Collica Furst, 2012). Honor killings involve murdering a family member whose actions are thought to have dishonored the family in some way (Collica Furst, 2012). Can you imagine knowing that you can and will be killed simply because of having your own beliefs, for wanting to marry someone you love other than the person that is being forced upon you, for having different taste in clothing (which many of us do), for speaking your own mind (freedom of speech), and just being unique or different (just being yourself). That is like having no freedom at all (like being in jail someone telling you what to do, where to go, what you have to wear, and what you can eat, and where you can go). Interpersonal violence/abuse and honor killings are similar in some ways because the person that is saying or doing things is trying to control the other person; they are causing fear in that person and causing harm to that person. Also most of the time these are done against women. Some of the differences in the two is that honor killings according to our readings is committed mainly by Muslims and domestic violence (which is a interpersonal crime) is by men of all faiths (religions), honor killings are planned and domestic violence is not, honor killing involve sometimes several family members and domestic violence is carried out by one man (Collica Furst, 2012). The best way for the criminal justice system to treat and respond to honor illings is to treat them as they are which is domestic violence/murders. No one should be allowed to take another human beings life. Everyone ha human rights. They need to charge them with murders and let the parties involved that this will not be tolerated. These victims before they are killed fear for their lives just as it states inour readings† One high-profile honor killing occurred on December 10, 2007, when 16-year-old Aqsa Parvez was murdered by her father, Muhammad, and brother, Waqas, in Canada. Parvez was killed because she refused to marry someone her parents had chosen for her. Her family also resented her refusal to wear traditional Islamic dress. Convinced her family members were conspiring to kill her, Parvez ran away from home. As she waited to board a bus, her father picked her up and, with the help of her brother, strangled his daughter to death (Collica Furst, 2012). This young girl knew what was going to happen and tried to flee but unfortunately she was able to and became another victim to these gruesome actions by the hands of her own father and brother. They should have shelters designed for this reason. I bet there are so many victims that would love to get out of the situation that they live in and this program would allow them an open door. A law needs to be passed that would prohibit these actions. I cannot believe that to this day you still have men telling their women what they can and cannot do, etc†¦